Read complaint
Sent to a friend There is a difference between seized by a rescue and surrendered/released/donated to a rescue. As a previous poster commented, what family member signed the "release" and why? What was the relationship? Was it a spouse, a parent? Either probably had the authority to do so, maybe they did it because the horse wasn't properly cared for and needed more and the so called "owner" didn't see it/provide it? If it had been actually seized, animal cruelty charges under Texas law would be involved, as in cruelty/neglect charges within the court system. I do find it interesting the original poster considers care of their horse as the "basic human right to own property" somewhat like owning a car I guess? That says a lot right there! My guess is there is a much more to this "story"......................
Posted 5 months ago
Comments
Add your comment
Please input verification code:

flag as inappropriate content

